data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec149/ec1497105075386d203588871274dd379d121b8a" alt=""
"But The Incredible Suit", I hear you cry, "you're a manically deranged, borderline psychotic Bond fan who owns one of Sean Connery's toupees and a pair of Daniel Craig's trunks, surely you lap this kind of thing up?" Well, yes and no. Yes, in that when Radio 4 did the same thing with 'Dr No' a couple of years ago, I downloaded it and spent a tedious bus journey through a remote and ugly part of China listening to it. No, in that it was abominably bad.
Toby Stephens, one of the movie series' worst ever villains, was hammier than a herd of pigs in a vat of salt brine, and David Suchet, as the eponymous bad guy, employed such a ludicrous vocal interpretation that it was as much as I could do to resist winding down the bus window and hurling my mp3 player into the nearest paddy field. Imagine a parrot emulating William Shatner's syntax while delivering lines like "No... BODY who... comestothis ISLAND has EEE-ver left it. DOYOUUNDERSTAND?!?! NOBODY!!!!!!"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2e50/d2e5058c734f31c66c2c3de24272532d23d99c24" alt=""
All of which leads to the inevitable graph of greatness of various formats of James Bond storytelling:
To comment on this post, click here
Surely the most obvious complaint about a future Radio 4 adaptation is that you CAN'T SEE THE TRUNKS!
ReplyDeleteMs So So Jeans
Surely you have several pictures of THE TRUNKS you could stare at whilst listening?
ReplyDeleteI agree that the book Bond is better than the Film Bond, but maybe that is because I read the books while the 'cold war' was still on and 'wimmin's lib' had yet to pour cold water on Bond's amorous moments and Q's gizmos had yet to be on public sale in Radio Shack.
ReplyDelete