I vaguely remember watching Sidney Lumet’s courtroom drama about 15 years ago and thinking it was quite good, but after a recent period of upholding justice by serving on a jury at the Old Bailey, I thought I’d give it another go. For those living in shameful ignorance (a small village near Swindon), a brief synopsis: twelve jurors retire to consider their verdict in a murder trial. Eleven of them think the accused is guilty, but the other (Henry Fonda) has convincing arguments otherwise, and tries to talk the majority round.
I can’t even put my finger on any central message the film has, because on one hand it’s about standing by your beliefs despite being in the minority, but on the other hand it’s about not being a stubborn twit and allowing people to change your mind if they’ve got a good argument. On another hand it’s about respect for other people, on yet another hand it’s about not allowing prejudice to get in the way of common sense, and on another hand still it’s about remaining calm in the face of a blustering idiot hole.
So essentially 12 Angry Men is a film with many hands, which makes sense having read this post but would be an incongruous poster quote. Perhaps this is why I haven’t yet been contacted by the Hollywood Marketing Board. Anyway, go away and watch it now and you’ll come away a better person. The Incredible Suit guarantees it.*
*The Incredible Suit does not guarantee it
Goodness me, how did that get in there?
To comment on this post, click here
What acting!
ReplyDeleteWhat acting?
What? Acting?
Its hard.... to imgine a remake could top the great drama of 12 Angry Men... but 12 Angry Chicks does it for me!
ReplyDeleteI feel so dirty.
ReplyDelete